Tom Brady is passionately defending his dual roles as a minority owner of the Las Vegas Raiders and the lead NFL color analyst for Fox Sports, asserting that there is absolutely no conflict of interest between the two positions.

In fact, he thinks any critics who suggest such a conflict are “blinded by distrust.”

Brady and the league have been catching flak ever since they lifted a ban on the future Hall of Fame quarterback from attending production meetings for games he is broadcasting. The ban had been put in place to quell concerns from other owners regarding a competitive edge.

That move, along with video of Brady popping up in the Raiders coaching booth with a headset on earlier this season, has amplified those concerns.

Reports indicated that Brady communicates with the Raiders’ offensive coordinator, Chip Kelly, two to three times per week to review film and discuss game plans, raising eyebrows about potential advantages for Las Vegas.

But the seven-time Super Bowl champ doesn’t want to hear about it.

Tom Brady: Conflict of interest, what conflict of interest?

Yes, access to the production meeting can lead to an advantage for Brady. It could help him learn what the opposing team is planning. For example, a coach might discuss plans to emphasize certain runs, passes, or defenses based on the matchup, providing insights into broader team strategies that extend beyond that single game.

Brady, for instance, worked the Chicago Bears-Dallas Cowboys game this past weekend. The Raiders will face both of those teams later in the season. Did the production meeting yield any insider info for Tom and his coaching staff?

Brady insists there is no controversy here. He addressed the matter in a newsletter in which he called critics “paranoid and distrustful.”

“People who are like that, particularly to a chronic, pathological degree, are telling on themselves,” he railed. “They’re showing you their worldview and how they operate. They’re admitting that they can only conceive of interests that are selfish; that they cannot imagine a person doing their job for reasons that are greater than themselves.”

He added, “These kinds of people make horrible teammates, by the way.”

READ MORE: Antonio Pierce Questions Tom Brady’s Dual Role in NFL

Former Raiders coach says he used the Information

Some might say that it’s actually Tom who is “blinded” here. Despite NFL-imposed restrictions—such as prohibiting him from attending other teams’ practices or harshly criticizing officials—Brady maintains he fully separates his responsibilities and remains committed to unbiased broadcasting.

But one simply can not overlook the value of the production meetings. And the fact that the league banned him from those meetings last year. There must have been a reason.

Former Raiders head coach Antonio Pierce called Brady out earlier this week, claiming he used information from those meetings to help his coaching staff.

“It’s not hard for him to watch a few things on a Friday practice or hear things in a production meeting and be like, ‘Hmm,’ and have tidbits,” Pierce insists. “And you’d be foolish enough to think that he’s not gonna share that with the Raiders because we had those conversations about certain things.”

Pierce refused to let up, claiming Tom Brady was an asset to the Raiders last season with the information he was getting as a broadcaster.

“I don’t know what the NFL has set for Tom Brady and his rules,” Pierce said, “but I know he was a great asset for us with the Raiders when I was there.”

Former Pro Bowl cornerback DeAngelo Hall, speaking to Betway, concurs with the assertion that there is a conflict of interest.

“First of all, I love Tom Brady. I love what he’s been able to accomplish in the NFL. To go from being one of the greatest players to ever play to now getting part ownership on a team like the Raiders, that’s a huge win for him. But I do think there is a conflict of interest at times,” Hall contends.

“When you’re doing those production meetings with teams as an analyst, you’re getting some of those secrets,” he added. “You might not get all the secret sauce, but you’re getting enough of those details of what’s coming up in the game plan that I think can help you.”

“The players ultimately have to go out there and perform, but I think some of the information in these production meetings can help you.”

Is there a problem here, or are critics simply “blinded” as Tom suggests?